Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2338 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-6100 - 205 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $94.98 vs $100.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-6100 - $0.46 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 51 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |