Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1405 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 3% better in New World than Ryzen 3 3200G - 110 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $81.39 vs $100.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing New World than Core i3-6100 - $0.76 vs $0.91 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
107
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |