Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3525 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 25% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3570 - 147 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 58 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $69.0 vs $94.98
- Up to 11% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-12100F - $0.58 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
89%
Price, $
$94.98
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |