Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4034 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-2400S - 379 vs 319 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $70.0 vs $94.98
- Up to 12% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-12100F - $0.22 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
379
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
88%
Price, $
$94.98
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3405 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |