Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2045 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 129 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 58 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $78.02 vs $94.98
- Up to 14% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-12100F - $0.64 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
86%
Price, $
$94.98
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
121
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |