Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1480 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-3570 - 213 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 0% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $59.14 vs $59.4
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73996 minutes ago
Buy for $59.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73994 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
656
55.59322033898305%
Multi-Core
1924
35.10948905109489%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |