Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1404 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 13% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $78.02 vs $89.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.59 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 136 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
133
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |