Buy on Amazon
$78.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $621
Availability
MSRP in USD: $621
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2024 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 160 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $59.99 vs $78.02
- Up to 26% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.37 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 Hexa-core (6 Core) 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
