Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1897 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 236 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 97% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $39.99 vs $1595.95
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 44 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75519 minutes ago
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75519 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 22 |
2 | Threads | 44 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 145 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |