Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1358 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 145 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 185 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $995.0 vs $1595.95
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$995
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for $995 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
70.1073985680191%
Multi-Core
9619
77.86772443940743%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |