Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 771 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $49.99 vs $1515.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G6900 - 171 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 64 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 324 minutes ago
Buy for $1,515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 328 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
97.98288508557457%
Multi-Core
2696
19.246145059965734%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |