Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 539 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $39.99 vs $944.95
- Up to 96% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.19 vs $4.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G6900 - 209 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.52/FPS
4%
Price, $
$944.95
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for $944.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |