Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1513 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 67% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-3450 - 45 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-3450 - $1.73 vs $2.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 24% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $59.0 vs $78.02
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
45
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
75%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2086 minutes ago
Buy for $59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |