Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 402 days older than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-5675C - $78.02 vs $90.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-5675C - $0.12 vs $0.13 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 3% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 701 vs 678 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
678
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4583 minutes ago
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4581 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |