Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 1054 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - 173 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-5675C - $68.02 vs $90.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-5675C - $0.44 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-5675C - 54 vs 65 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9714 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
155
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9714 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |