Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2447 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $90.0 vs $94.98
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-5675C - 205 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-5675C - $0.46 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-5675C - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2261 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.98
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2262 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |