Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1989 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-2600K - 180 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $78.02 vs $85.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-2600K - $0.43 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |