Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7350K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7350K is 197 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 4% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 176 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $51.6 vs $78.02
- Up to 37% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.29 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 60 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2947 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2946 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |