Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1304 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Core i3-3250 - 202 vs 190 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i3-7350K - $48.0 vs $49.99
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 55 vs 60 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74301 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
36.63911845730027%
Multi-Core
1130
39.33170901496693%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |