Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7350K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7350K is 197 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 535 vs 526 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $51.6 vs $78.02
- Up to 33% better value when playing World of Tanks than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.1 vs $0.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 60 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 12 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
535
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3001 minutes ago
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3003 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |