Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 1249 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Pentium G6950 - 211 vs 210 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 55 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $47.48 vs $58.38
- Up to 18% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-3250 - $0.23 vs $0.28 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $58.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
210
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |