Buy on Amazon
$47.48
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $87
Availability
MSRP in USD: $87
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 1575 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-4690 - $47.48 vs $52.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Control than Core i5-4690 - $0.24 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 73 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Pentium G6950 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 4 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
199
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.48
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G6950 Processor 2.8GHz 3 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-4690 Processor (6M Cache, 3.5 GHz upto 3.90 GHz) BX80646I54690, CPU Only
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
