Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-6200 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-6200 is 781 days newer than the more expensive Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 73 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in Remnant II than Pentium G6950 - 78 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Pentium G6950 - $42.85 vs $47.48
- Up to 11% better value when playing Remnant II than Pentium G6950 - $0.55 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 6 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
FPS
78
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |