Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 794 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - $42.85 vs $45.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6200 - 171 vs 153 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing World of Warcraft than FX-6200 - $0.26 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 54 vs 125 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 677 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$45
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 678 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |