Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4170 outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4170 is 794 days newer than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than FX-6200 - 182 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than FX-6200 - $41.6 vs $42.85
- Up to 18% better value when playing Rust than FX-6200 - $0.23 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 54 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |