Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 826 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 13% cheaper than Pentium G3258 - $42.85 vs $49.37
- Up to 13% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Pentium G3258 - $0.27 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6200 - 159 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 53 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 838 minutes ago
Buy for $49.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 838 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |