Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2120T outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-2120T is 176 days older than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-2120T - $42.85 vs $60.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-2120T - $0.33 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than FX-6200 - 129 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13776 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13776 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |