Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-6200 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-6200 is 95 days older than the more expensive Celeron G550.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G550 - 70 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Celeron G550 - $42.85 vs $49.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G550 - $0.61 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
FPS
70
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 923 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 923 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |