Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-8120 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-8120 is 233 days older than the more expensive Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Celeron G550 - 251 vs 250 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Celeron G550 - $39.99 vs $49.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing F1 22 than Celeron G550 - $0.16 vs $0.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Celeron G550 LGA1155 2.6G 32NM Dual-Core Processor, BX80623G550
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CHUANGWEI AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 125W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
