Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1187 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Celeron G550 - 159 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Celeron G550 - $39.9 vs $49.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G550 - $0.25 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Celeron G550 LGA1155 2.6G 32NM Dual-Core Processor, BX80623G550
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
