Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240 is 94 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G550 - 211 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G550 - $41.0 vs $49.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G550 - $0.19 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |