Buy on Amazon
$39.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-8120 outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-8120 is 138 days older than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6200 - 441 vs 439 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than FX-6200 - $39.99 vs $42.85
- Up to 10% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6200 - $0.09 vs $0.1 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
441
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CHUANGWEI AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 125W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 15.5x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
