Buy on Amazon
$39.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1910 days newer than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than FX-8120 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than FX-8120 - $39.0 vs $39.99
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
CHUANGWEI AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 125W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
