Buy on Amazon
$42.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-6200 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-6200 is 281 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i5-2405S - $42.85 vs $46.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-2405S - $0.2 vs $0.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1144 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-2405S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52405S
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i5-2405S
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-2405S |
|---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
