Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1458 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-2120T - 154 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-2120T - $19.0 vs $60.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-2120T - $0.12 vs $0.4 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |