Buy on Amazon
$51.36
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 946 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 24% cheaper than Pentium G3258 - $39.0 vs $51.36
- Up to 24% better value when playing Elden Ring than Pentium G3258 - $0.35 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3258 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 53 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
