Buy on Amazon
$49.37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $187
Availability
MSRP in USD: $187
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4460 is 22 days older than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-4460 - $49.37 vs $64.04
- Up to 18% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i5-4460 - $0.53 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 53 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 5% better in Sons Of The Forest than Pentium G3258 - 98 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 4 vs 2 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
93
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.37
100%
Value Winner
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for $49.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3325 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-4460 LGA 1150 CPU - BX80646I54460
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3324 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Core i5-4460
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
