Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 644 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than FX-4130 - 112 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 55% cheaper than Pentium G3258 - $22.92 vs $51.36
- Up to 54% better value when playing Elden Ring than Pentium G3258 - $0.21 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |