Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-4130 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1100 days newer than the more expensive FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 19% better in Diablo IV than FX-4130 - 107 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than FX-4130 - $19.0 vs $22.92
- Up to 28% better value when playing Diablo IV than FX-4130 - $0.18 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
107
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |