Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4130 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4130 is 87 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G550.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G550 - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Celeron G550 - $22.92 vs $49.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G550 - $0.15 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$22.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7217 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |