Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4130 outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4130 is 320 days newer than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 43% cheaper than FX-8120 - $22.92 vs $39.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8120 - $0.14 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7289 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7289 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |