Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-2100 is 554 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-2100 - $22.92 vs $49.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-2100 - $0.07 vs $0.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-4130 - 318 vs 317 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6655 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6656 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |