Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 286 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $22.92 vs $56.34
- Up to 60% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-3250 - $0.21 vs $0.52 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-4130 - 109 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 55 vs 125 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6645 minutes ago
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6645 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |