Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3417 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 62% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $22.92 vs $59.99
- Up to 54% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Celeron G6900 - $0.13 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 17% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-4130 - 215 vs 183 FPS
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7189 minutes ago
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |