Key Differences
In short — FX-4130 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-4130 is 358 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G540 - 154 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 16% cheaper than FX-4130 - $19.25 vs $22.92
- Up to 13% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-4130 - $0.13 vs $0.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
153
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |