Buy on Amazon
$22.92
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4130 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4130 is 7 days older than the more expensive Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-3240T - $22.92 vs $25.7
- Up to 12% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3240T - $0.15 vs $0.17 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
