Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240T outperforms the more expensive FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240T is 7 days newer than the more expensive FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-4130 - 144 vs 143 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-4130 - $25.7 vs $52.02
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76510 minutes ago
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76510 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |