Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1304 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $58.38 vs $70.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-7100 - $0.23 vs $0.26 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Core i3-3250 - 272 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 51 vs 55 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
254
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $58.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |