Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6300 - 170 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $58.02 vs $65.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77953 minutes ago
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77952 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |