Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1336 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 5% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $74.04 vs $78.02
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 5 than FX-6300 - 169 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4485 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
94%
FPS Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4486 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |