Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3131 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 16% better in Valorant than Core i3-3250 - 798 vs 690 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $39.99 vs $48.0
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74195 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
33.18777292576419%
Multi-Core
1130
41.91394658753709%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |