Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3131 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 3% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $58.4 vs $59.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-3250 - 135 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-3250 - $0.44 vs $0.5 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $58.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |